Paper detail

Asymptotic optimality of a greedy randomized algorithm in a large-scale service system with general packing constraints

We consider a service system model primarily motivated by the problem of efficient assignment of virtual machines to physical host machines in a network cloud, so that the number of occupied hosts is minimized. There are multiple types of arriving customers, where a customer's mean service time depends on its type. There is an infinite number of servers. Multiple customers can be placed for service into one server, subject to general "packing" constraints. Service times of different customers are independent, even if served simultaneously by the same server. Each new arriving customer is placed for service immediately, either into a server already serving other customers (as long as packing constraints are not violated) or into an idle server. After a service completion, each customer leaves its server and the system. We propose an extremely simple and easily implementable customer placement algorithm, called Greedy-Random (GRAND). It places each arriving customer uniformly at random into either one of the already occupied servers (subject to packing constraints) or one of the so-called zero-servers, which are empty servers designated to be available to new arrivals. One instance of GRAND, called GRAND($aZ$), where $a\ge 0$ is a parameter, is such that the number of zero-servers at any given time $t$ is $aZ(t)$, where $Z(t)$ is the current total number of customers in the system. We prove that GRAND($aZ$) with $a>0$ is asymptotically optimal, as the customer arrival rates grow to infinity and $a\to 0$, in the sense of minimizing the total number of occupied servers in steady state. In addition, we study by simulations various versions of GRAND and observe the dependence of convergence speed and steady-state performance on the number of zero-servers.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.