Paper detail

Asymptotic irrelevance of initial conditions for Skorohod reflection mapping on the nonnegative orthant

A reflection map, induced by the deterministic Skorohod problem on the nonnegative orthant, is applied to an $\mathbb{R}^n$ valued function $X$ on $[0,\infty)$ and then to $a+X$, where $a$ is a nonnegative constant vector. A question that has been open for over 15 years is under what conditions the difference between the two resulting regulated functions converges to zero for any choice of $a$ as time diverges. This in turn implies that if one imposes enough stochastic structure that ensures that the reflection map applied to a multidimensional process $X$ converges in distribution then it will also converge in distribution when it is applied to $η+X$ where $η$ is any almost surely finite valued random vector that may even depend on the process $X$. In this paper we obtain a useful equivalent characterization of this property. As a result we are able to identify a natural sufficient condition in terms of the given data $X$ and the constant routing matrix. A similar necessary condition is also indicated. A particular implication of our analysis is that under additional stochastic assumptions, asymptotic irrelevance of the initial condition does note require the existence of a stationary distribution. As immediate corollaries of our (and earlier) results we conclude that under the natural stability conditions, a reflected Lévy process as well as Markov additive process has a unique stationary distribution and converges in distribution to this stationary distribution for every initial condition. Extensions of the sufficient condition are then developed for reflection maps with drift and routing coefficients that may be time and state dependent; some implications to multidimensional insurance models are briefly discussed.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.