Paper detail

Asymptotic independence of three statistics of maximal segmental scores

Let $ξ_1,ξ_2,\ldots$ be an iid sequence with negative mean. The $(m,n)$-segment is the subsequence $ξ_{m+1},\ldots,ξ_n$ and its \textit{score} is given by $\max\{\sum_{m+1}^nξ_i,0\}$. Let $R_n$ be the largest score of any segment ending at time $n$, $R^*_n$ the largest score of any segment in the sequence $ξ_{1},\ldots,ξ_n$, and $O_x$ the overshoot of the score over a level $x$ at the first epoch the score of such a size arises. We show that, under the Cramér assumption on $ξ_1$, asymptotic independence of the statistics $R_n$, $R_n^* -y$ and $O_{x+y}$ holds as $\min\{n,y,x\}\to\infty$. Furthermore, we establish a novel Spitzer-type identity characterising the limit law $O_\infty$ in terms of the laws of $(1,n)$-scores. As corollary we obtain: (1) a novel factorization of the exponential distribution as a convolution of $O_\infty$ and the stationary distribution of $R$; (2) if $y=γ^{-1}\log n$ (where $γ$ is the Cramér coefficient), our results, together with the classical theorem of Iglehart \cite{Iglehart}, yield the existence and explicit form of the joint weak limit of $(R_n, R_n^* -y,O_{x+y})$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.