Paper detail

Asymptotic distribution of the numbers of vertices and arcs of the giant strong component in sparse random digraphs

Two models of a random digraph on $n$ vertices, $D(n,\text{Prob}(\text{arc})=p)$ and $D(n,\text{number of arcs}=m)$ are studied. In 1990, Karp for $D(n,p)$ and independently T. Łuczak for $D(n,m=cn)$ proved that for $c>1$, with probability tending to 1, there is an unique strong component of size of order $n$. Karp showed, in fact, that the giant component has likely size asymptotic to $nθ^2$, where $θ=θ(c)$ is the unique positive root of $1-θ=e^{-c θ}$. In this paper we prove that, for both random digraphs, the joint distribution of the number of vertices and number of arcs in the giant strong component is asymptotically Gaussian with the same mean vector $n\boldsymbolμ(c)$, $\boldsymbolμ(c):=(θ^2, cθ^2)$ and two distinct $2\times 2$ covariance matrices, $n\mathbf{B}(c)$ and $n[\mathbf{B}(c)+c (\boldsymbolμ'(c))^T (\boldsymbolμ'(c)))]$. To this end, we introduce and analyze a randomized deletion process which determines the directed $(1,1)$-core, the maximal digraph with minimum in-degree and out-degree at least 1. This $(1,1)$-core contains all non-trivial strong components. However, we show that the likely numbers of peripheral vertices and arcs in the $(1,1)$-core, those outside the largest strong component, are of log-polynomial order, thus dwarfed by anticipated fluctuations, on the scale of $n^{1/2}$, of the giant component parameters. By approximating the likely realization of the deletion algorithm with a deterministic trajectory, we obtain our main result via exponential supermartingales and Fourier-based techniques.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.