Paper detail

Asymptotic approximations to the Hardy-Littlewood function

The function $Q(x):=\sum_{n\ge 1} (1/n) \sin(x/n)$ was introduced by Hardy and Littlewood [10] in their study of Lambert summability, and since then it has attracted attention of many researchers. In particular, this function has made a surprising appearance in the recent disproof by Alzer, Berg and Koumandos [1] of a conjecture by Clark and Ismail [2]. More precisely, Alzer et. al. [1] have shown that the Clark and Ismail conjecture is true if and only if $Q(x)\ge -π/2$ for all $x>0$. It is known that $Q(x)$ is unbounded in the domain $x \in (0,\infty)$ from above and below, which disproves the Clark and Ismail conjecture, and at the same time raises a natural question of whether we can exhibit at least one point $x$ for which $Q(x) < -π/2$. This turns out to be a surprisingly hard problem, which leads to an interesting and non-trivial question of how to approximate $Q(x)$ for very large values of $x$. In this paper we continue the work started by Gautschi in [7] and develop several approximations to $Q(x)$ for large values of $x$. We use these approximations to find an explicit value of $x$ for which $Q(x)<-π/2$.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.