Paper detail

Asymptotic analysis of chaotic particle sedimentation and trapping in the vicinity of a vertical upward streamline

The sedimentation of a heavy Stokes particle in a laminar plane or axisymmetric flow is investigated by means of asymptotic methods. We focus on the occurrence of Stommel's retention zones, and on the splitting of their separatrices. The goal of this paper is to analyze under which conditions these retention zones can form, and under which conditions they can break and induce chaotic particle settling. The terminal velocity of the particle in still fluid is of the order of the typical velocity of the flow, and the particle response time is much smaller than the typical flow time-scale. It is observed that if the flow is steady and has an upward streamline where the vertical velocity has a strict local maximum, then inertialess particle trajectories can take locally the form of elliptic Stommel cells, provided the particle terminal velocity is close enough to the local peak flow velocity. These structures only depend on the local flow topology and do not require the flow to have closed streamlines or stagnation points. If, in addition, the flow is submitted to a weak time-periodic perturbation, classical expansions enable one to write the particle dynamics as a hamiltonian system with one degree of freedom, plus a perturbation containing both the dissipative terms of the particle motion equation and the flow unsteadiness. Melnikov's method therefore provides accurate criteria to predict the splitting of the separatrices of the elliptic cell mentioned above, leading to chaotic particle trapping and chaotic settling. The effect of particle inertia and flow unsteadiness on the occurrence of simple zeros in Melnikov's function is discussed. Particle motion in a plane cellular flow and in a vertical pipe is then investigated to illustrate these results.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.