Paper detail

Asymmetries in the angular distribution of the CMB

We investigate some of the asymmetries reported in the CMB temperature angular distribution considering the ΛCDM model in the 3, 5 and 7 year WMAP data. We aim to analyze the 4 quadrants of the ILC CMB maps using 3 Galactic cuts: the WMAP KQ85 mask, a |b|<10 degrees and the WMAP KQ85 mask +|b|<10 degrees Galactic cuts. We used the two-point angular correlation function in the WMAP maps for each of their quadrants. The same procedure was done for 1000 Monte Carlo simulations that were produced using the WMAP team ΛCDM best-fit power spectrum. We also changed the quadrupole and octopole amplitudes to fit their observable WMAP values in the ΛCDM model, hereafter MΛCDM. Our analysis showed asymmetries between the southeastern quadrant (SEQ) and the other quadrants (southwestern quadrant (SWQ), northeastern quadrant (NEQ) and northwestern quadrant (NWQ)). Over all WMAP maps, the probability for the occurrence of the SEQ-NEQ, SEQ-SWQ and SEQ-NWQ asymmetries varies from 0.1% (SEQ-NEQ) to 8.5% (SEQ-SWQ) using the KQ85 mask and the KQ85 mask + |b|<10 degrees Galactic cut, respectively. We also calculated the probabilities for the MΛCDM, finding no significant differences in the results. Moreover, the cold spot region was covered with masks of 5,10 and 15 degrees radius and again the results remained unchanged. This analysis was also repeated for random regions in the SEQ quadrant with a 15-degree mask and the SEQ quadrant still remained asymmetric with respect to the other quadrants of the CMB map. We found an excess of power in the TPCF at scales >100 degrees in the SEQ with respect to the other quadrants that is independent of the Galactic cut used, and found no evidence for its possible relation with the cold spot signal. We could not find any specific region within the SEQ that might be considered responsible for the quadrant asymmetry.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.