Paper detail

Asymmetric reheating from a symmetric inflationary potential

We explore a model of two-field inflation with nonminimal kinetic terms in which two identical matter sectors decoupled from each other may reheat to different temperatures while preserving the symmetry of the Lagrangian. This scenario is motivated by mirror dark matter models in which the temperature of the mirror sector is constrained to be $T'\lesssim0.5 T$ by big bang nucleosynthesis and the cosmic microwave background. For a given class of nonminimal kinematic terms, we find that the symmetric field trajectory $X=Y$ is a repeller solution, such that any randomly-occurring asymmetry in the initial conditions is amplified by many orders of magnitude during inflation, far beyond what canonical power-law models can achieve. Isocurvature fluctuations are strongly suppressed in this model, but a $\mathcal O(0.03$--$0.07$) tensor-to-scalar ratio could be observed in the near future. The range of potential parameters compatible with {\it Planck} constraints is shown to be much larger than in corresponding single-field models. This occurs through a mechanism for lowering the spectral index that we dub CTHC: curved trajectory at horizon crossing.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.