Paper detail

Asymmetric Little model and its ground state energies

In this paper we look at a class of random optimization problems that arise in the forms typically known in statistical physics as Little models. In \cite{BruParRit92} the Little models were studied by means of the well known tool from the statistical physics called the replica theory. A careful consideration produced a physically sound conclusion that the behavior of almost all important features of the Little models essentially resembles the behavior of the corresponding ones of appropriately scaled Sherrington-Kirkpatrick (SK) model. In this paper we revisit the Little models and consider their ground state energies as one of their main features. We then rigorously show that they indeed can be lower-bounded by the corresponding ones related to the SK model. We also provide a mathematically rigorous way to show that the replica symmetric estimate of the ground state energy is in fact a rigorous upper-bound of the ground state energy. Moreover, we then recall on a set of powerful mechanisms we recently designed for a study of the Hopfield models in \cite{StojnicHopBnds10,StojnicMoreSophHopBnds10} and show how one can utilize them to substantially lower the upper-bound that the replica symmetry theory provides.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.