Paper detail

Asymmetric Leaky Private Information Retrieval

Information-theoretic formulations of the private information retrieval (PIR) problem have been investigated under a variety of scenarios. Symmetric private information retrieval (SPIR) is a variant where a user is able to privately retrieve one out of $K$ messages from $N$ non-colluding replicated databases without learning anything about the remaining $K-1$ messages. However, the goal of perfect privacy can be too taxing for certain applications. In this paper, we investigate if the information-theoretic capacity of SPIR (equivalently, the inverse of the minimum download cost) can be increased by relaxing both user and DB privacy definitions. Such relaxation is relevant in applications where privacy can be traded for communication efficiency. We introduce and investigate the Asymmetric Leaky PIR (AL-PIR) model with different privacy leakage budgets in each direction. For user privacy leakage, we bound the probability ratios between all possible realizations of DB queries by a function of a non-negative constant $ε$. For DB privacy, we bound the mutual information between the undesired messages, the queries, and the answers, by a function of a non-negative constant $δ$. We propose a general AL-PIR scheme that achieves an upper bound on the optimal download cost for arbitrary $ε$ and $δ$. We show that the optimal download cost of AL-PIR is upper-bounded as $D^{*}(ε,δ)\leq 1+\frac{1}{N-1}-\frac{δe^ε}{N^{K-1}-1}$. Second, we obtain an information-theoretic lower bound on the download cost as $D^{*}(ε,δ)\geq 1+\frac{1}{Ne^ε-1}-\fracδ{(Ne^ε)^{K-1}-1}$. The gap analysis between the two bounds shows that our AL-PIR scheme is optimal when $ε=0$, i.e., under perfect user privacy and it is optimal within a maximum multiplicative gap of $\frac{N-e^{-ε}}{N-1}$ for any $(ε,δ)$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.