Paper detail

Asymmetric Gluon Distributions and Hard Diffractive Electroproduction

The ``asymmetric'' matrix element <p-r|G...G|p> that appears in the pQCD description of hard diffractive electroproduction does not coincide with that defining the gluon distribution function f_g(x). I outline a pQCD formalism based on a concept of the double distribution F_g(x,y), which specifies the fractions xp, yr, (1-y)r of the initial proton momentum p and the momentum transfer r, resp., carried by the gluons. For $t \equiv r^2 =0$, r is proportional to p: $r = ζp$, and it is convenient to parameterize the matrix element <p-r|G...G|p> by an asymmetric distribution function ${\cal F}_ζ^g (X)$ depending on the total fractions $X \equiv x+y ζ$ and $X-ζ= x- (1-y) ζ$ of the initial hadron momentum p carried by the gluons.I formulate evolution equations for ${\cal F}_ζ^g (X)$, study some of their general properties and discuss the relationship between ${\cal F}_ζ^g (X)$, F_g(x,y) and f_g(x).

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.