Paper detail

Asymmetric Expansion of the Fe ejecta in Kepler's Supernova Remnant

The ejecta kinematics of supernova remnants (SNRs) is one of crucial clues to understand the explosion mechanism of type Ia supernovae (SNe). In particular, the kinematic asymmetry of iron-peak elements provides the key to understanding physical processes taking place in the core of the exploding white dwarfs (WDs) although it has been poorly understood by observations. In this paper, we show for the first time the asymmetric expansion structure in the line-of-sight direction of Fe ejecta in Kepler's SNR revealed by spectral and imaging analysis using the Chandra archival data. We found that the K$α$ line centroid energy and line width is relatively lower ($<$ 6.4 keV) and narrower ($\sim$80 eV) around the center of the remnant, which implies that the majority of the Fe ejecta in the central region is red-shifted. At the outer regions, we identify bright blue-shifted structures as it might have been ejected as high velocity dense clumps. Taking into account the broad population of the Fe charge states, we estimate the red-shifted velocity of ~2,000 km/s and the blue-shifted velocity of ~3,000 km/s for each velocity structure. We also present a possibility that a portion of the Fe ejecta near the center are interacting with the dense circumstellar medium (CSM) on the near side of the remnant. As the origin of the asymmetric motion of the Fe ejecta, we suggest three scenarios, (1) the asymmetric distribution of the CSM, (2) the "shadow" in Fe cast by the companion star, and (3) the asymmetric explosion.

preprint2018arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.