Paper detail

Asymmetric expansion of coronal mass ejections in the low corona

Aims. The study of the morphology of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) is an auspicious approach to understanding how magnetic fields are structured within CMEs. Although earlier studies have suggested an asymmetry in the width of CMEs in orthogonal directions, this has not been inspected using multi-viewpoint observations. Methods. We inspect the early evolution (below ten solar radii) of the morphology of a dozen CMEs occurring under specific conditions of observing spacecraft location and CME trajectory, favorable to reduce uncertainties typically involved in the 3D reconstruction used here. These events are carefully reconstructed by means of a forward modeling tool using simultaneous observations of STEREO EUVI and SDO/AIA as input when originating low in the corona, and followed up in the outer fields of view of the STEREO and the SOHO coronagraphs. We then examine the height evolution of the morphological parameters arising from the reconstructions. Results. The multi-viewpoint analysis of this set of CMEs revealed that their initial expansion --below three solar radii-- is considerably asymmetric and non-self-similar. Both angular widths, namely along the main axes of CMEs ($AW_L$) and in the orthogonal direction ($AW_D$, representative of the flux rope diameter), exhibit much steeper change rates below this height, with the growth rate of $AW_L$ found to be larger than that of $AW_D$, also below that height. Angular widths along the main axes of CMEs are on average $\approx$1.8 times larger than widths in the orthogonal direction $AW_D$. The ratios of the two expansion speeds, namely in the directions of CMEs main axes and in their orthogonal, are nearly constant in time after $\sim$4 solar radii, with an average ratio $\approx$1.6. Heights at which the width change rate is defined to stabilize are greater for $AW_L$ than for $AW_D$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.