Paper detail

Astrophysical foregrounds and primordial tensor-to-scalar ratio constraints from CMB B-mode polarization observations

We study the effects of astrophysical foregrounds on the ability of CMB B-mode polarization experiments to constrain the primordial tensor-to-scalar ratio, r. To clean the foreground contributions we use parametric, maximum likelihood component separation technique, and consider experimental setups optimized to render a minimal level of the foreground residuals in the recovered CMB map. We consider nearly full-sky observations, include two diffuse foreground components, dust and synchrotron, and study cases with and without calibration errors, spatial variability of the foreground properties, and partial or complete B-mode lensing signal removal. In all these cases we find that in the limit of very low noise level and in the absence of the intrumental or modeling systematic effects, the foreground residuals do not lead to a limit on the lowest detectable value of r. But the need to control the foreground residuals will play a major role in determining the minimal noise levels necessary to permit a robust detection of r < 0.1 and therefore in optimizing and forecasting the performance of the future missions. For current and proposed experiments noise levels, the foreground residuals are found non-negligible and potentially can affect our ability to set constraints on r. We also show how the constraints can be significantly improved on by restricting the post component separation processing to a smaller sky area. This procedure applied to a case of a COrE-like satellite mission is shown to result potentially in over an order of magnitude improvement in the detectable value of r. With sufficient knowledge of the experimental bandpasses as well as foreground component scaling laws, our conclusions are found to be independent on the assumed overall normalization of the foregrounds and only quantitatively depend on specific parametrizations assumed for the foreground components.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.