Paper detail

Astrophysical analysis of the measurement of (alpha,gamma) and (alpha,n) cross sections of 169Tm

Reaction cross sections of 169Tm(alpha,gamma)173Lu and 169Tm(alpha,n)172Lu have been measured in the energy range 12.6<=E_alpha<=17.5 MeV and 11.5<=E_alpha<=17.5 MeV, respectively, using the recently introduced method of combining activation with X-ray counting. Improved shielding allowed to measure the (alpha,gamma) to lower energy than previously possible. The combination of (alpha,gamma) and (alpha,n) data made it possible to study the energy dependence of the alpha width. While absolute value and energy dependence are perfectly reproduced by theory at energies above 14 MeV, the observed change in energy dependence at energies below 14 MeV requires a modification of the predicted alpha width. Using an effective, energy-dependent, local optical alpha+nucleus potential it is possible to reproduce the data but the astrophysical rate is still not well constrained at gamma-process temperatures. The additional uncertainty stemming from a possible modification of the compound formation cross section is discussed. Including the remaining uncertainties, the recommended range of astrophysical reaction rate values at 2 GK is higher than the previously used values by factors of 2-37.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.