Paper detail

Astrophotometric search for massive stars in the Milky way. Confronting Random Forest predictions with available spectroscopy

Massive stars play a significant role in different branches of astronomy, from shaping the processes of star and planet formation to influencing the evolution and chemical enrichment of the distant universe. Despite their high astrophysical significance, these objects are rare and difficult to detect. With Gaia's advent, we now possess extensive kinematic and photometric data for a significant portion of the Galaxy that can unveil, among others, new populations of massive star candidates. In order to produce bonafide bright (G magnitude $<$ 12) massive star candidate lists (threshold set to spectral type B2 or earlier but slight changes in this threshold also explored) in the Milky Way subject to be followed up by future massive spectroscopic surveys, we have developed a Gaia DR3 plus literature data based methodology. We trained a Balanced Random Forest (BRF) with the spectral types from the compilation by Skiff et al. (2014) as labels. Our approach yields a completeness of $\sim80\%$ and a purity ranging from $0.51 \pm 0.02$ for probabilities between 0.6 and 0.7, up to $0.85 \pm 0.05$ for the 0.9-1.0 range. To externally validate our methodology, we searched for and analyzed archival spectra of moderate to high probability (p $>$ 0.6) candidates that are not contained in our catalog of labels. Our independent spectral validation confirms the expected performance of the BRF, spectroscopically classifying 300 stars as B3 or earlier (due to observational constraints imposed in the B0-3 range), including 107 new stars. Based on the most conservative yields of our methodology, our candidate list could increase the number of bright massive stars by $\sim$50\%. As a byproduct, we developed an automatic methodology for spectral typing optimized for LAMOST spectra, based on line detection and characterization guiding a decision path.

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.