Paper detail

Asteroseismology of evolved stars to constrain the internal transport of angular momentum. III. Using the rotation rates of intermediate-mass stars to test the Fuller-formalism

Context: The internal characteristics of stars, such as their core rotation rates, are obtained via asteroseismic observations. A comparison of core rotation rates found in this way with core rotation rates as predicted by stellar evolution models demonstrate a large discrepancy. This means that there must be a process of angular momentum transport missing in the current theory of stellar evolution. A new formalism was recently proposed to fill in for this missing process, which has the Tayler instability as its starting point (hereafter referred to as `Fuller-formalism'). Aims: We investigate the effect of the Fuller-formalism on the internal rotation of stellar models with an initial mass of 2.5 Mo. Methods: Stellar evolution models, including the Fuller-formalism, of intermediate-mass stars were calculated to make a comparison between asteroseismically obtained core rotation rates in the core He burning phase and in the white dwarf phase. Results: Our main results show that models including the Fuller-formalism can match the core rotation rates obtained for the core He burning phases. However, these models are unable to match the rotation rates obtained for white dwarfs. When we exclude the Fuller-formalism at the end of the core He burning phase, the white dwarf rotation rates of the models match the observed rates. Conclusions: We conclude that in the present form, the Fuller-formalism cannot be the sole solution for the missing process of angular momentum transport in intermediate-mass stars.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.