Paper detail

Asteroseismic modeling of gravity modes in slowly rotating A/F stars with radiative levitation

It has been known for several decades that transport of chemical elements is induced by the process of microscopic atomic diffusion. Yet, the effect of atomic diffusion, including radiative levitation, has hardly been studied in the context of gravity mode pulsations of core-hydrogen burning stars. In this paper, we study the difference in the properties of such modes for models with and without atomic diffusion. We perform asteroseismic modeling of two slowly rotating A- and F-type pulsators, KIC11145123 ($f_{\rm rot} \approx0.010~{\rm d}^{-1}$) and KIC9751996 ($f_{\rm rot} \approx0.0696~{\rm d}^{-1}$), respectively, based on the periods of individual gravity modes. For both stars, we find models whose g-mode periods are in very good agreement with the {\it Kepler\/} asteroseismic data, keeping in mind that the theoretical/numerical precision of present-day stellar evolution models is typically about two orders of magnitude lower than the measurement errors. Using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) we have made a comparison between our best models with and without diffusion, and found very strong evidence for signatures of atomic diffusion in the pulsations of KIC11145123. In the case of KIC9751996 the models with atomic diffusion are not able to explain the data as well as the models without it. Furthermore, we compare the observed surface abundances with those predicted by the best fitting models. The observed abundances are inconclusive for KIC9751996, while those of KIC11145123 from the literature can better be explained by a model with atomic diffusion.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.