Paper detail

Asteroseismic determination of the physical characteristics of the planetary system host HR\,8799 ($λ$ Bootis nature and age)

HR\,8799 is a $λ$ Bootis, $γ$ Doradus star hosting a planetary system and a debris disk with two rings. This makes this system a very interesting target for asteroseismic studies. In particular, this work is devoted to the determination of the internal metallicity of this star, linked with its $λ$ Bootis nature, and its age, taking the advantage of its $γ$ Doradus-type pulsations. To do so we have used the equilibrium code CESAM and the non-adiabatic pulsational code GraCo. We have applied the Frequency Ratio Method and the Time Dependent Convection theory to estimate the mode identification, the Brunt-Vaïsälä frequency integral and the mode instability, making a selection of the possible models fulfilling all observational constraints. Using the position of the star in the HR diagram, the solar metallicity models is discarded. This result contradicts one of the main assumptions of the most accepted hypothesis explaining the $λ$ Bootis nature, the accretion/diffusion of gas from a star with solar metallicity. Therefore, in sight of these new results, a revision of this hypothesis is needed. The inclusion of accurate internal chemical mixing is necessary. The use of the asteroseismological constraints provides a very accurate determination of the physical characteristics of HR\,8799: an age in the ranges [1123, 1625] and [26, 430] Myr, and a mass in the ranges [1.32, 1.33] and [1.44, 1.45] $M_{\odot}$, respectively, depending on the visual angle $i$. The determination of this angle and more accurate multicolor photometric observations can definitively fix the mass, metallicity and age of this star. In particular, an accurate age estimation is needed for a correct understanding of the planetary system. In our study we have found that the age widely used for modelling the system is unlike.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.