Paper detail

Assisted concentration of Gaussian resources

In spite of their outstanding experimental relevance, Gaussian operations in continuous-variable quantum systems are subjected to fundamental limitations, as it is known that general resources cannot be distilled within the Gaussian paradigm. We show that these limitations can be overcome by considering a collaborative setting where one party increases the amount of local resource with the aid of another party, whose operations are assumed to be Gaussian but are otherwise unrestricted; the two parties can only communicate classically. We show that in single-shot scenarios, unlike in the well-known case of entanglement theory, two-way classical communication does not lead to any improvement over one-way classical communication from the aiding party to the aided party. We then provide a concise general expression for the Gaussian resource of assistance, i.e., the maximum amount of resource that can be obtained when the aiding party holds a purification of the aided party's state, as measured by a general monotone. To demonstrate its usefulness, we apply our result to two important kinds of resources, squeezing and entanglement, and find some simple analytic solutions. In the case of entanglement theory, we are able to find general upper bounds on the regularized Gaussian entanglement of assistance, and to establish additivity for tensor powers of thermal states. This allows us to draw a quantitative and enlightening comparison with the performance of assisted entanglement distillation in the non-Gaussian setting. On the technical side, we develop some variational expressions to handle functions of symplectic eigenvalues that may be of independent interest. Our results suggest further potential for Gaussian operations to play a major role in practical quantum information processing protocols.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.