Paper detail

Assisted Common Information with an Application to Secure Two-Party Sampling

In this paper we generalize the notion of common information of two dependent variables introduced by Gács & Körner. They defined common information as the largest entropy rate of a common random variable two parties observing one of the sources each can agree upon. It is well-known that their common information captures only a limited form of dependence between the random variables and is zero in most cases of interest. Our generalization, which we call the Assisted Common Information system, takes into account almost-common information ignored by Gács-Körner common information. In the assisted common information system, a genie assists the parties in agreeing on a more substantial common random variable; we characterize the trade-off between the amount of communication from the genie and the quality of the common random variable produced using a rate region we call the region of tension. We show that this region has an application in deriving upperbounds on the efficiency of secure two-party sampling, which is a special case of secure multi-party computation, a central problem in modern cryptography. Two parties desire to produce samples of a pair of jointly distributed random variables such that neither party learns more about the other's output than what its own output reveals. They have access to a set up - correlated random variables whose distribution is different from the desired distribution - and noiseless communication. We present an upperbound on the rate at which a given set up can be used to produce samples from a desired distribution by showing a monotonicity property for the region of tension: a protocol between two parties can only lower the tension between their views. Then, by calculating the bounds on the region of tension of various pairs of correlated random variables, we derive bounds on the rate of secure two-party sampling.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.