Paper detail

Assessment of turbulence-chemistry interaction models in MILD combustion regime

The present paper reports on the assessment of different turbulence-chemistry interaction closures for modeling turbulent combustion in the Moderate and Intense Low oxygen Dilution combustion regime. 2D RANS simulations have been carried out to model flames issuing from two burners DJHC burner and Adelaide JHC burner which imitate the MILD combustion. In order to model these flames, two different approaches of turbulence-chemistry interaction models are considered; while in the PDF based modeling, two different variants are invoked to understand the applicability of the PDF based models in the MILD regime: one is based on presumed shape PDF approach and the other one is transported PDF approach. A comprehensive study has been carried out by comparing the results obtained from these different models. For the DJHC burner, the computations are carried out for a jet speed corresponding to Reynolds numbers of Re=4100, whereas the Adelaide JHC burner computations are performed for a jet speed corresponding to Reynolds number of Re=10000. The effects of molecular diffusion on the flame characteristics are also studied by using different micro-mixing models. In the case of DJHC burner, it has been observed that the mean axial velocity and the turbulent kinetic energy profiles are in good agreement with the measurements. However, the temperature profiles are over-predicted in the downstream region by both EDC and the PDF based models. In the context of Adelaide JHC burner, the profiles of the temperature and the mass fraction of major species (CH4, H2, O2, H2O, CO2) obtained using LPDF approach are in better agreement with the measurements compared to those obtained using EDC model; although, both the solution approaches fail to capture CO and OH radical profiles.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.