Paper detail

Assessment of Soot Formation Models in Lifted Ethylene/Air Turbulent Diffusion Flame

In the present study, soot formation in the turbulent lifted diffusion flame, consisting of ethylene-air is numerically investigated using three different soot modeling approaches and is comprehensively reported. For turbulence-chemistry interaction, Flamelet generated manifold (FGM) model is used. A detailed kinetics is used which is represented through POLIMI mechanism (Ranzi et al. 2012). Soot formation is modeled using two different approaches, semi-empirical two-equation approach and Quadrature methods of moments approach, where both the approaches consider various sub-processes such as nucleation, coagulation, surface growth and oxidation. The radiation heat transfer is taken into account considering four fictitious gasses in conjunction with the weighted-sum-of-gray gas (WSSGM) approach for modeling absorption coefficient. The experimental and earlier published numerical data from Köhler et al. (2012) and Blacha et al. (2011) are used for assessment of different soot modeling approaches. The discrepancies between numerical and experimental data are observed due to under-prediction of OH radicals concentration and poor fuel-air mixing ratios in the vicinity of the fuel jet region leading to early soot formation and the trends are unaffected after invoking radiation.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.