Paper detail

Assessment of petrophysical quantities inspired by joint multifractal approach

In this paper joint multifractal random walk approach is carried out to analyze some petrophysical quantities for characterizing the petroleum reservoir. These quantities include Gamma emission (GR), sonic transient time (DT) and Neutron porosity (NPHI) which are collected from four wells of a reservoir. To quantify mutual interaction of petrophysical quantities, joint multifractal random walk is implemented. This approach is based on the mutual multiplicative cascade notion in the multifractal formalism and in this approach $L_0$ represents a benchmark to describe the nature of cross-correlation between two series. The analysis of the petrophysical quantities revealed that GR for all wells has strongly multifractal nature due to the considerable abundance of large fluctuations in various scales. The variance of probability distribution function, $λ_{\ell}^2$, at scale $\ell$ and its intercept determine the multifractal properties of the data sets sourced by probability density function. The value of $λ_0 ^2$ for NPHI data set is less than GR's, however, DT shows a nearly monofractal behavior, namely $λ_0 ^2\rightarrow 0$, so we find that $λ_0^2({\rm GR})>λ_0^2({\rm NPHI})\ggλ_0^2({\rm DT})$. While, the value of Hurst exponents can not discriminate between series GR, NPHI and DT. Joint analysis of the petrophysical quantities for considered wells demonstrates that $L_0$ has negative value for GR-NPHI confirming that finding shaly layers is in competition with finding porous medium while it takes positive value for GR-DT determining that continuum medium can be detectable by evaluating the statistical properties of GR and its cross-correlation to DT signal.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.