Paper detail

Assessment of Microbial Habitability Across Solar System Targets

With a fleet of exploratory space missions on the horizon, the study of target specific biospheres is crucial for accurately determining the probability of the existence of microbial life on various planetary bodies and prioritising targets accordingly. Although previous studies have compared the potential habitability of objects in our solar system by bulk characteristics, it is less common that precise qualitative methods are developed for ranking candidates hospitable to microbial life on a local environment basis. In this review we create a planetary environmental database and use it to motivate a list of primary habitability candidates and essential criteria for microbial survival. We then propose a new method, the Microbial Habitability Index (MHI) which uses a metric of microbial survival factor values in target environments compared with appropriate Earth analogues to assess their potential for life. We arrive at a selection of eight primary candidates and from this set conclude that Europa, Mars, and Enceladus have the highest potential for facilitating microbial survival.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.