Paper detail

Assessing visual acuity in visual prostheses through a virtual-reality system

Current visual implants still provide very low resolution and limited field of view, thus limiting visual acuity in implanted patients. Developments of new strategies of artificial vision simulation systems by harnessing new advancements in technologies are of upmost priorities for the development of new visual devices. In this work, we take advantage of virtual-reality software paired with a portable head-mounted display and evaluated the performance of normally sighted participants under simulated prosthetic vision with variable field of view and number of pixels. Our simulated prosthetic vision system allows simple experimentation in order to study the design parameters of future visual prostheses. Ten normally sighted participants volunteered for a visual acuity study. Subjects were required to identify computer-generated Landolt-C gap orientation and different stimulus based on light perception, time-resolution, light location and motion perception commonly used for visual acuity examination in the sighted. Visual acuity scores were recorded across different conditions of number of electrodes and size of field of view. Our results showed that of all conditions tested, a field of view of 20° and 1000 phosphenes of resolution proved the best, with a visual acuity of 1.3 logMAR. Furthermore, performance appears to be correlated with phosphene density, but showing a diminishing return when field of view is less than 20°. The development of new artificial vision simulation systems can be useful to guide the development of new visual devices and the optimization of field of view and resolution to provide a helpful and valuable visual aid to profoundly or totally blind patients.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.