Paper detail

Assessing the Predictive Power of Galaxy Formation Models with the Rest-Frame Optical Luminosity Functions at 2.0<z<3.3

We compare recently measured rest-frame V-band luminosity functions (LFs) of galaxies at redshifts 2.0<z<3.3 to predictions of semianalytic models by De Lucia & Blaizot and Bower et al. and hydrodynamic simulations by Dave et al. The models succeed for some luminosity and redshift ranges and fail for others. A notable success is that the Bower et al. model provides a good match to the observed LF at z~3. However, all models predict an increase with time of the rest-frame V-band luminosity density, whereas the observations show a decrease. The models also have difficulty matching the observed rest-frame colors of galaxies. In all models the luminosity density of red galaxies increases sharply from z~3 to z~2.2, whereas it is approximately constant in the observations. Conversely, in the models the luminosity density of blue galaxies is approximately constant, whereas it decreases in the observations. These discrepancies cannot be entirely remedied by changing the treatment of dust and suggest that current models do not yet provide an adequate description of galaxy formation and evolution since z~3.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.