Paper detail

Assessing the Performance of Leja and Clenshaw-Curtis Collocation for Computational Electromagnetics with Random Input Data

We consider the problem of quantifying uncertainty regarding the output of an electromagnetic field problem in the presence of a large number of uncertain input parameters. In order to reduce the growth in complexity with the number of dimensions, we employ a dimension-adaptive stochastic collocation method based on nested univariate nodes. We examine the accuracy and performance of collocation schemes based on Clenshaw-Curtis and Leja rules, for the cases of uniform and bounded, non-uniform random inputs, respectively. Based on numerical experiments with an academic electromagnetic field model, we compare the two rules in both the univariate and multivariate case and for both quadrature and interpolation purposes. Results for a real-world electromagnetic field application featuring high-dimensional input uncertainty are also presented.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.