Paper detail

Assessing the complexity of orbital parameters after asymmetric kick in binary pulsars

The dynamical characterization of the Millisecond Pulsar (MSP) parameters is a key issue in understanding these systems. We present an analytical analysis of the orbital parameters of binary MSPs with long periods (Porb > 2 d) and circular (e < 0.1) orbits, produced by an asymmetric kick model imparted during the Accretion Induced Collapse (AIC) of white dwarfs process. It turns out that the distribution of orbits peaks up to P_orb;f < 90 d with strong circularization. Considering the different assumptions about the distribution of companions He stars 3M< Mcom < 5M, the binary will affect the setups of the balance condition of minimum energy. Our analytical approach is just the first approach to the more complete models required for describing all binary parameters after an asymmetric kick. Therefore, we have also run some numerical simulations in order to compare their results with the analytical studies. We aim to initiate the first exploration of the full complexity of the problem, when combining a variable kick time and a variable kick vector direction. Indeed, the numerical simulations show patterns resembling the complex behavior found in chaotic scattering problems. Although we deal with a deterministic problem and bounded orbits, the regular characteristic orbits are found in more realistic phases during the AIC process. In addition, the overall process can show complex behaviors strongly associated with the internal kick mechanisms. This would lead us to identify the nature of regular orbits and their orbital morphology.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.