Paper detail

Assessing the behavior and performance of a supervised term-weighting technique for topic-based retrieval

This article analyses and evaluates FDD\b{eta}, a supervised term-weighting scheme that can be applied for query-term selection in topic-based retrieval. FDD\b{eta} weights terms based on two factors representing the descriptive and discriminating power of the terms with respect to the given topic. It then combines these two factor through the use of an adjustable parameter that allows to favor different aspects of retrieval, such as precision, recall or a balance between both. The article makes the following contributions: (1) it presents an extensive analysis of the behavior of FDD\b{eta} as a function of its adjustable parameter; (2) it compares FDD\b{eta} against eighteen traditional and state-of-the-art weighting scheme; (3) it evaluates the performance of disjunctive queries built by combining terms selected using the analyzed methods; (4) it introduces a new public data set with news labeled as relevant or irrelevant to the economic domain. The analysis and evaluations are performed on three data sets: two well-known text data sets, namely 20 Newsgroups and Reuters-21578, and the newly released data set. It is possible to conclude that despite its simplicity, FDD\b{eta} is competitive with state-of-the-art methods and has the important advantage of offering flexibility at the moment of adapting to specific task goals. The results also demonstrate that FDD\b{eta} offers a useful mechanism to explore different approaches to build complex queries.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.