Paper detail

Assessing student's achievement gap between ethnic groups in Brazil

Achievement gaps refer to the difference in the performance on examinations of students belonging to different social groups. Achievement gaps between ethnic groups have been observed in several countries with heterogeneous populations. In this paper, we analyze achievement gaps between ethnic populations in Brazil by studying the performance of a large cohort of senior high-school students in a standardized national exam. We separate ethnic groups into the Brazilian states to remove potential biases associated to infrastructure and financial resources, cultural background and ethnic clustering. We focus on the disciplines of mathematics and writing that involve different cognitive functions. We estimate the gaps and their statistical significance through the Welch&#39;s t-test and study key socio-economic variables that may explain the existence or absence of gaps. We identify that gaps between ethnic groups are either statistically insignificant (p<.01) or small (2%-6%) if statistically significant, for students living in households with low income. Increasing gaps however may be observed for higher income. On the other hand, while higher parental education is associated to higher performance, it may either increase, decrease or maintain the gaps between White and Black, and between White and Pardo students. Our results support that socio-economic variables have major impact on student&#39;s performance in both mathematics and writing examinations irrespectively of ethnic backgrounds, giving evidence that genetic factors have little or no effect on ethnic group performance when students are exposed to similar cultural and financial contexts.

preprint2018arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.