Paper detail

Assessing site-specific enhancements imparted by hyperpolarized water in folded and unfolded proteins by 2D HMQC NMR

Hyperpolarized water can be a valuable aid in protein NMR, leading to amide group 1H polarizations that are orders of magnitude larger than their thermal counterparts. Suitable procedures can exploit this to deliver 2D 1H-15N correlations with good resolution and enhanced sensitivity. These enhancements depend on the exchange rates between the amides and the water, thereby yielding diagnostic information about solvent accessibility. This study applied this HyperW method to four proteins exhibiting a gamut of exchange behaviors: PhoA4, an unfolded 122-residue fragment; barstar, a fully folded ribonuclease inhibitor; R17, a 13.3 kDa system possessing folded and unfolded forms under slow interconversion; and drkN SH3, a protein domain whose folded and unfolded forms interchange rapidly and with temperature-dependent population ratios. For PhoA4 HyperW sensitivity enhancements were larger than 300-fold, as expected for an unfolded protein sequence. Though fully folded barstar also exhibited substantial enhancements; these, however, were not uniform, and according to CLEANEX experiments reflected the solvent-exposed residues. R17 showed the expected superposition of 100-fold enhancements for its unfolded form, coexisting with more modest folded counterparts. Unexpected, however, was the behavior of drkN SH3, for which HyperW enhanced the unfolded but even more certain folded protein sites. These preferential enhancements were repeatedly and reproducibly observed; a number of explanations including three-site exchange magnetization transfers between water, unfolded and folded states; cross-correlated relaxation processes from hyperpolarized structural waters and labile sidechain protons; and the possibility that faster solvent exchange rates characterize certain folded sites over their unfolded counterparts are considered to account for them.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.