Paper detail

Assessing Site Effects and Geographic Transferability when Interpolating Point Referenced Spatial Data: A Digital Soil Mapping Case Study

When making inferences concerning the environment, ground truthed data will frequently be available as point referenced (geostatistical) observations that are clustered into multiple sites rather than uniformly spaced across the area of interest. In such situations, the similarity of the dominant processes influencing the observed data across sites and the accuracy with which models fitted to data from one site can predict data from another site provide valuable information for scientists seeking to make inferences from these data. Such information may motivate a more informed second round of modelling of the data and also provides insight into the generality of the models developed and an indication of how these models may perform at predicting observations from other sites. We have investigated the geographic transferability of site specific models and compared the results of using different implementations of site specific effects in models for data combined from two sites. Since we have access to data on a broad collection of environmental characteristics that each held potential to aid the interpolation of our geostatistical response observations we have investigated these issues within the framework of a computationally efficient method for variable selection when the number of explanatory variables exceeds the number of observations. We have applied Least Absolute Shrinkage Selection Operator (LASSO) regularized Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) as fitted by the computationally efficient Least Angle Regression algorithm. The response variable in our case study, soil carbon, is of interest as a potential location for the sequestration of atmospheric carbon dioxide and for its positive contribution to soil health and fertility.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.