Paper detail

Assessing membership projection errors in star forming regions

Young stellar clusters harbour complex spatial structures emerging from the star formation process. Identifying stellar over-densities is a key step to constrain better how these structures are formed. The high accuracy of distances derived from Gaia DR2 parallaxes yet do not allow to locate with certainty individual stars within clusters of size $\approx 1\, \rm{pc}$. In this work, we explore how such uncertainty in distance estimates can lead to the misidentification of membership of sub-clusters selected by the minimum spanning tree (MST) algorithm. Our goal is to assess how this impacts their estimated properties. Using N-body simulations, we build Gravity-Driven Fragmentation (GDF) models that reproduce self-consistently the early stellar configurations of a star forming region. Stellar groups are then identified both in 3- and 2-dimensions by the MST algorithm, representing respectively an ideal and an inaccurate identification. We compare the properties derived of these resulting groups, to assess the systematic bias introduced by projection and incompleteness. We show that in such fragmented configurations, the dynamical mass of groups identified in projection is systematically underestimated compared to those of groups identified in 3D. This systematic error is statistically of $50\%$ for more than half of the groups and reach $100\%$ in a quarter of them. Adding incompleteness further increases this bias. These results challenge our ability to identify accurately sub-clusters in most nearby star forming regions where distance estimate uncertainties are comparable to the size of the region. New clump finding methods have to tackle this issue in order to define better the dynamical state of these substructures.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.