Paper detail

Assembly Conformity of Structure Growth: Fossil versus Normal Groups of Galaxies

Using a semi-analytic method calibrated to the global star formation history and the stellar mass function at $z=0$, we attempt to understand the most stellar deficient galaxy groups. We argue such groups are a kind of fossil group (FGs) -- in comparison to the normal groups of galaxies, they assemble both halo and stellar mass earlier. We find there is a central galaxy and satellite conformity between these FGs and normal groups: centrals and satellites in the former form earlier and more stellar deficient than their counterparts of the latter. We term this effect "Assembly Conformity" of dark matter halos. This effect accounts for about 70 percent of the difference in stellar content between FGs and normal groups. When split by the peak redshift for the star formation rate of a group, the mass functions of satellite halos on either side of the peak redshift are found to be indistinguishable between FGs and normal groups, indicating a self-similarity of halo assembly with respect to the peak. The "baryonic environmental" effect due to ram-pressure and gas heating accounts for about 30 percent of the difference in stellar content. While the total stellar mass of FGs is lower than that of normal groups, we predict that the mass of the brightest central galaxy of FGs is, on average, higher than that of normal groups. We also predict that in the central galaxies of FGs, there is a negative stellar age gradient from the center outward, where the opposite is expected for those in normal groups.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.