Paper detail

Assembly bias in the local PNG halo bias and its implication for $f_{\rm NL}$ constraints

We use $N$-body simulations to study halo assembly bias (i.e., the dependence of halo clustering on properties beyond total mass) in the density and primordial non-Gaussianity (PNG) linear bias parameters $b_1$ and $b_ϕ$, respectively. We consider concentration, spin and sphericity as secondary halo properties, for which we find a clear detection of assembly bias for $b_1$ and $b_ϕ$. At fixed total mass, halo spin and sphericity impact $b_1$ and $b_ϕ$ in a similar manner, roughly preserving the shape of the linear $b_ϕ(b_1)$ relation satisfied by the global halo population. Halo concentration, however, drives $b_1$ and $b_ϕ$ in opposite directions. This induces significant changes to the $b_ϕ(b_1)$ relation, with higher concentration halos having higher amplitude of $b_ϕ(b_1)$. For $z=0.5$ and $b_1 \approx 2$ in particular, the population comprising either all halos, those with the $33\%$ lowest or those with the $33\%$ highest concentrations have a PNG bias of $b_ϕ\approx 3$, $b_ϕ\approx -1$ and $b_ϕ\approx 9$, respectively. Varying the halo concentration can make $b_ϕ$ very small and even change its sign. These results have important ramifications for galaxy clustering constraints of the local PNG parameter $f_{\rm NL}$ that assume fixed forms for the $b_ϕ(b_1)$ relation. We illustrate the significant impact of halo assembly bias in actual data using the BOSS DR12 galaxy power spectrum: assuming that BOSS galaxies are representative of all halos, the $33\%$ lowest or the $33\%$ highest concentration halos yields $σ_{f_{\rm NL}} = 44, 165, 19$, respectively. Our results suggest taking host halo concentration into account in galaxy selection strategies to maximize the signal-to-noise on $f_{\rm NL}$. They also motivate more simulation-based efforts to study the $b_ϕ(b_1)$ relation of halos and galaxies.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.