Paper detail

Aspects of inflation and the very early universe

Until recently our knowledge of the primordial curvature perturbation was relatively modest. Ever since COBE delivered its map of data we know the scalar spectrum of primordial perturbations is approximately flat, with the power being only slightly stronger at larger scales. Most inflationary models predict an approximately scale-invariant spectrum, which therefore cannot be used as a distinctive signature. To distinguish between different inflationary microphysics we need to study higher point statistics of the primordial perturbation, which can encode non-gaussian data. In the first part of this thesis we study the bispectrum in all single-field models with a well-defined quantum field theory during a quasi-de Sitter inflationary phase. Any single-field models without ghost-like instabilities fall into this description: from canonical, to Dirac-Born-Infeld inflation and galileon inflation theories. We investigate the scale and shape- dependences of the bispectrum to next-order in the slow-roll approximation. We illustrate our results by applying them to different models and argue these corrections must be taken into account to keep the theoretical error below the observational precision set by the Planck satellite. We then explore the ability of using bispectrum shapes to distinguish between inflationary models more efficiently. We further extend the study of the bispectrum of single-field models beyond the slow-roll approximation, demanding the spectral index to be close to, but not exactly, unity. In the second part of this thesis we explore the process by which the universe is repopulated with matter particles at the end of a Dirac-Born-Infeld inflation phase. We place some mild bounds on the reheating temperature of these models. We argue that the constraints arising from the preheating analysis are complementary to those derived from the primordial perturbation.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.