Paper detail

Aspects of diffusive-relaxation dynamics with a non-uniform, partially absorbing boundary in general porous media

We consider the Helmholtz problem in the context of the evolution of uniform initial distribution of a physical attribute in general porous media subject to a partially absorbing boundary condition. Its spectral property as a reflection of the boundary geometry has been widely exploited, such as in biological and geophysical applications. We consider the situation where the critical assumptions which enable such applications break down. Specifically, what are the consequences of an inhomogeneous absorption strength? By means of perturbation theory, exact theoretical results, and numerical simulations on random sphere packs, we identify the regions of parameter space in which such inhomogeneity is important and those in which it is not. Our findings shed light on the issue that limits the mapping between the diffusion/relaxation spectrum and the underlying boundary geometry.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.