Paper detail

ASCA X-Ray Spectroscopy of LMC Supernova Remnants and the Metal Abundances of the LMC

We present the results of X-ray spectroscopy of a flux-limited sample of seven middle-aged supernova remnants (SNRs) in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) (N23, N49, N63A, DEM71, N132D, 0453-68.5, and N49B), using nonequilibrium ionization Sedov-phase SNR models. All the remnants were well described by the model, allowing us to derive accurate values for their ages, densities, initial explosion energies, and metal abundances. Four SNRs are fully consistent with the Sedov model and yield a mean value of the initial SN explosion energy of (1.1+/-0.5)x10^51 erg. We show that it is likely that the other three remnants exploded within preexisting cavities in the interstellar medium. The limits on high energy X-ray emission (>3 keV) that we present indicate that these SNRs do not contain very luminous pulsar-powered synchrotron nebulae. We find statistical evidence for enrichment by supernova ejecta in the sense that smaller remnants show a somewhat higher mean metallicity than the larger ones. For DEM71, the remnant of a SN Ia, the derived Fe abundance is about a factor of two larger than the other remnants in the sample. These things being said, however, the derived abundances are in general dominated by swept-up interstellar material and so we use the SNR sample to estimate the mean LMC gas-phase abundances. We find that the astrophysically common elements from O to Fe are less abundant than the solar values by factors of 2--4. Overall these results are consistent with previous ones based on optical and UV data, but do not show the anomalous overabundance of Mg and Si seen by others.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.