Paper detail

ASCA Observations of the Twin Supernova Remnants in the Large Magellanic Cloud, DEM L316

We report results from an ASCA X-ray study of DEM L316, an emission nebula in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) consisting of two closely-spaced supernova remnants (SNRs). The SIS image shows separate X-ray sources located at the positions of the two radio- and optically-emitting SNR shells, 0547$-$69.7A and 0547$-$69.7B (hereafter, shell A and B). The individual X-ray spectrum of each shell is well described by optically-thin thermal emission, although the characteristics of the emission differ in important details between them. Shell A exhibits strong iron L emission, which we attribute to the presence of iron-rich ejecta leading to the suggestion that this SNR originates from a Type Ia SN, an explosion of a moderate mass progenitor. Shell B, on the other hand, has a chemical composition similar to that of the interstellar medium of the LMC and so its X-ray emission is dominated by swept-up matter. The different spectral features strongly disfavor the hypothesis that the two shells are due to one supernova explosion into an interconnected bubble. We could not obtain the evidence which positively supports the collision between two SNRs.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.