Paper detail

ASCA observations of deep ROSAT fields I. the nature of the X-ray source populations

We present ASCA GIS observations (total exposure 100-200 ksec) of three fields which form part of our deep ROSAT survey. We detect 26 sources down to a limiting flux (2-10 keV) of 5x10^{-14} erg cm-2 s-1. Sources down to this flux level contribute 30 per cent of the 2-10 keV X-ray background. The number-count distribution, logN-logS, is a factor of three above the ROSAT counts, assuming a photon spectral index of 2 for the ROSAT sources. This suggests the presence at hard energies of a population other than the broad-line AGN which contribute to the ROSAT counts. This is supported by spectroscopic observations that show a large fraction of sources that are not obvious broad-line AGN. The average 1-10 keV spectral index of these sources is flat (0.92+-0.16), significantly different than that of the broad-line AGN (1.78+-0.16). Although some of the Narrow Emission Line Galaxies which are detected with ROSAT are also detected here, the nature of the flat spectrum sources remains as yet unclear.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.