Paper detail

ASCA Observation of the Nearest Gravitational Lensing Cluster Candidate -- A 3408

We observed the nearest gravitational lensing cluster candidate, A 3408 (${\it z}=0.042$), with ASCA. The projected mass profile of A 3408 was determined from the ICM temperature and the $β$-model parameters obtained with ASCA, assuming that the hot gas is spherically symmetric and in hydrostatic equilibrium. The projected mass within an arc radius, $r_{\rm arc}$, of 110 kpc is $M(r_{\rm arc})=1.2^{+0.8}_{-0.4} \times10^{13} \MO$. This is 18 -- 45% of the mass previously derived from a lensing analysis by Campusano et al. (1998, AAA 069.160.189) without any X-ray information. The primary cause of this discrepancy is in their assumption that the center of the cluster potential coincides with the position of the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG), while we reveal the BCG position to be 60$''$ outside of the X-ray center. We further calculated a model for the source galaxy position and the gravitational potential that can reproduce both the X-ray data and the arc image. In this model, the magnification factor of the lens for the source galaxy was evaluated to be $Δm=$ 0.07$\pm$0.03 mag; i.e., the source galaxy is slightly magnified by the lens cluster A 3408.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.