Paper detail

Artificial intelligence as a gateway to scientific discovery: Uncovering features in retinal fundus images

Purpose: Convolutional neural networks can be trained to detect various conditions or patient traits based on retinal fundus photographs, some of which, such as the patient sex, are invisible to the expert human eye. Here we propose a methodology for explainable classification of fundus images to uncover the mechanism(s) by which CNNs successfully predict the labels. We used patient sex as a case study to validate our proposed methodology. Approach: First, we used a set of 4746 fundus images, including training, validation and test partitions, to fine-tune a pre-trained CNN on the sex classification task. Next, we utilized deep learning explainability tools to hypothesize possible ways sex differences in the retina manifest. We measured numerous retinal properties relevant to our hypotheses through image segmentation to identify those significantly different between males and females. To tackle the multiple comparisons problem, we shortlisted the parameters by testing them on a set of 100 fundus images distinct from the images used for fine-tuning. Finally, we used an additional 400 images, not included in any previous set, to reveal significant sex differences in the retina. Results: We observed that the peripapillary area is darker in males compared to females ($p=.023, d=.243$). We also observed that males have richer retinal vasculature networks by showing a higher number of branches ($p=.016, d=.272$) and nodes ($p=.014, d=.299$) and a larger total length of branches ($p=.045, d=.206$) in the vessel graph. Also, vessels cover a greater area in the superior temporal quadrant of the retina in males compared to females ($p=0.048, d=.194$). Conclusions: Our methodology reveals retinal features in fundus photographs that allow CNNs to predict traits currently unknown, but meaningful to experts.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.