Paper detail

Arithmetic expanders and deviation bounds for random tensors

We prove hypergraph variants of the celebrated Alon-Roichman theorem on spectral expansion of sparse random Cayley graphs. One of these variants implies that for every prime $p\geq 3$ and any $\varepsilon > 0$, there exists a set of directions $D\subseteq \mathbb{F}_p^n$ of size $O_{p,\varepsilon}(p^{(1-1/p +o(1))n})$ such that for every set $A\subseteq \mathbb{F}_p^n$ of density $α$, the fraction of lines in $A$ with direction in $D$ is within $\varepsilonα$ of the fraction of all lines in $A$. Our proof uses new deviation bounds for sums of independent random multi-linear forms taking values in a generalization of the Birkhoff polytope. The proof of our deviation bound is based on Dudley's integral inequality and a probabilistic construction of $\varepsilon$-nets. Using the polynomial method we prove that a Cayley hypergraph with edges generated by a set~$D$ as above requires $|D| \geq Ω_p(n^{p-1})$ for (our notion of) spectral expansion for hypergraphs.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.