Paper detail

Arithmetic Average Density Fusion -- Part IV: Distributed Heterogeneous Fusion of RFS and LRFS Filters via Variational Approximation

This paper, the fourth part of a series of papers on the arithmetic average (AA) density fusion approach and its application for target tracking, addresses the intricate challenge of distributed heterogeneous multisensor multitarget tracking, where each inter-connected sensor operates a probability hypothesis density (PHD) filter, a multiple Bernoulli (MB) filter or a labeled MB (LMB) filter and they cooperate with each other via information fusion. Earlier papers in this series have proven that the proper AA fusion of these filters is all exactly built on averaging their respective unlabeled/labeled PHDs. Based on this finding, two PHD-AA fusion approaches are proposed via variational minimization of the upper bound of the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the local and multi-filter averaged PHDs subject to cardinality consensus based on the Gaussian mixture implementation, enabling heterogeneous filter cooperation. One focuses solely on fitting the weights of the local Gaussian components (L-GCs), while the other simultaneously fits all the parameters of the L-GCs at each sensor, both seeking average consensus on the unlabeled PHD, irrespective of the specific posterior form of the local filters. For the distributed peer-to-peer communication, both the classic consensus and flooding paradigms have been investigated. Simulations have demonstrated the effectiveness and flexibility of the proposed approaches in both homogeneous and heterogeneous scenarios.

preprint2024arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.