Paper detail

Area, Perimeter, Height, and Width of Rectangle Visibility Graphs

A rectangle visibility graph (RVG) is represented by assigning to each vertex a rectangle in the plane with horizontal and vertical sides in such a way that edges in the graph correspond to unobstructed horizontal and vertical lines of sight between their corresponding rectangles. To discretize, we consider only rectangles whose corners have integer coordinates. For any given RVG, we seek a representation with smallest bounding box as measured by its area, perimeter, width, or height (height is assumed not to exceed width). We derive a number of results regarding these parameters. Using these results, we show that these four measures are distinct, in the sense that there exist graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ with $area(G_1)<area(G_2)$ but $perimeter(G_2)<perimeter(G_1)$, and analogously for all other pairs of these parameters. We further show that there exists a graph $G_3$ with representations $S_1$ and $S_2$ such that $area(G_3)=area(S_1)<area(S_2)$ but $perimeter(G_3)=perimeter(S_2)<perimeter(S_1)$. In other words, $G_3$ requires distinct representations to minimize area and perimeter. Similarly, such graphs exist to demonstrate the independence of all other pairs of these parameters. Among graphs with $n \leq 6$ vertices, the empty graph $E_n$ requires largest area. But for graphs with $n=7$ and $n=8$ vertices, we show that the complete graphs $K_7$ and $K_8$ require larger area than $E_7$ and $E_8$, respectively. Using this, we show that for all $n \geq 8$, the empty graph $E_n$ does not have largest height, width, area, or perimeter among all RVGs on $n$ vertices.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.