Paper detail

Area Optimized Quasi Delay Insensitive Majority Voter for TMR Applications

Mission-critical and safety-critical applications generally tend to incorporate triple modular redundancy (TMR) to embed fault tolerance in their physical implementations. In a TMR realization, an original function block, which may be a circuit or a system, and two exact copies of the function block are used to successfully overcome any temporary fault or permanent failure of an arbitrary function block during the routine operation. The corresponding outputs of the function blocks are majority voted using 3-input majority voters whose outputs define the outputs of a TMR realization. Hence, a 3-input majority voter forms an important component of a TMR realization. Many synchronous majority voters and an asynchronous non-delay insensitive majority voter have been presented in the literature. Recently, quasi delay insensitive (QDI) asynchronous majority voters for TMR applications were also discussed in the literature. In this regard, this paper presents a new QDI asynchronous majority voter for TMR applications, which is better optimized in area compared to the existing QDI majority voters. The proposed QDI majority voter requires 30.2% less area compared to the best of the existing QDI majority voters, and this could be useful for resource-constrained fault tolerance applications. The example QDI TMR circuits were implemented using a 32/28nm complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) process. The delay insensitive dual rail code was used for data encoding, and 4-phase return-to-zero and return-to-one handshake protocols were used for data communication.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.