Paper detail

Are Ultra-faint Galaxies at z=6-8 Responsible for Cosmic Reionization ? Combined Constraints from the Hubble Frontier Fields Clusters and Parallels

We use deep Hubble Space Telescope imaging of the Frontier Fields to accurately measure the galaxy rest-frame ultraviolet luminosity function (UV LF) in the redshift range $z \sim 6-8$. We combine observations in three lensing clusters A2744, MACS0416, MACS0717 and their associated parallels fields to select high-redshift dropout candidates. We use the latest lensing models to estimate the flux magnification and the effective survey volume in combination with completeness simulations performed in the source plane. We report the detection of 227 galaxy candidates at $z=6-7$ and 25 candidates at $z \sim 8$. While the total survey area is about 4 arcmin$^{2}$ in each parallel field, it drops to about 0.6 to 1 arcmin$^{2}$ in the cluster core fields because of the strong lensing. We compute the UV luminosity function at $z \sim 7$ using the combined galaxy sample and perform Monte Carlo simulations to determine the best fit Schechter parameters. We are able to reliably constrain the LF down to an absolute magnitude of $M_{UV}=-15.25$, which corresponds to 0.005$L^{\star}$. More importantly, we find that the faint-end slope remains steep down to this magnitude limit with $α=-2.04_{-0.17}^{+0.13}$. Our results confirm the most recent results in deep blank fields but extend the LF measurements more than two magnitudes deeper. The UV LF at $z \sim 8$ is not very well constrained below $M_{UV}=-18$ due to the small number statistics and incompleteness uncertainties. To assess the contribution of galaxies to cosmic reionization we derive the UV luminosity density at $z\sim7$ by integrating the UV LF down to an observationally constrained limit of $M_{UV} = -15$. We show that our determination of Log($ρ_{UV}$)=$26.2\pm0.13$ (erg s$^{-1}$ Hz$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-3}$) can be sufficient to maintain the IGM ionized.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access11 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.