Paper detail

Are the total mass density and the low-mass end slope of the IMF anti-correlated?

We conduct a detailed lensing, dynamics and stellar population analysis of nine massive lens early-type galaxies (ETGs) from the X-Shooter Lens Survey (XLENS). Combining gravitational lensing constraints from HST imaging with spatially-resolved kinematics and line-indices constraints from VLT X-Shooter (XSH) spectra, we infer the low-mass slope and the low cut-off mass of the stellar Initial Mass Function (IMF): $x_{250}=2.37^{+0.12}_{-0.12}$ and $M_{{\rm low}, 250}= 0.131^{+0.023}_{-0.026}\, M_{\odot}$, respectively, for a reference point with $σ\equiv 250\, {\rm kms}^{-1}$ and R$_{\rm eff} \equiv 10$ kpc. All the XLENS systems are consistent with an IMF slope steeper than Milky Way-like. We find no significant correlations between IMF slope and any other quantity, except for an anti-correlation between total dynamical mass density and low-mass IMF slope at the 87% CL [$dx/d\log(ρ)$ = $ -0.19^{+0.15}_{-0.15}$]. This anti-correlation is consistent with the low redshift lenses found by Smith et al. (2015) that have high velocity dispersions and high stellar mass densities but surprisingly shallow IMF slopes.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.