Paper detail

Are small radii of compact stars ruled out by GW170817/AT2017gfo?

The detection of GW170817 and its electromagnetic counterparts allows to constrain the equation of state of dense matter in new and complementary ways. Very stiff equations of state are ruled out by the upper limit on the average tidal deformability, $\tildeΛ\lesssim 800$, imposed by the detected gravitational wave signal. A lower limit, $\tildeΛ\gtrsim 400$, can also be extracted by considering the large amount of ejected matter which powers the kilonova AT2017gfo. By using several microscopic nucleonic equations of state, we first confirm the existence of a monotonic relation between $R_{1.5}$ (the radius of the $1.5M_{\odot}$ configuration) and $\tildeΛ$. This translates the limits on $\tildeΛ$ into limits on the radius: $11.8\,\text{km} \lesssim R_{1.5} \lesssim 13.1\,$km. We then show that the monotonic relation is violated, if a second branch of compact stars composed of quark matter exists, as in the two-families or the twin-stars scenarios. In particular, it is possible to fulfill the limits on $\tildeΛ$ while having $R_{1.5}$ significantly smaller than $12\,$km. In both those scenarios the event GW170817/AT2017gfo originates from the merger of a hadronic star and a star containing quark matter.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.